The people behind every score.
SupplementScore is reviewed by a rotating board of clinicians, pharmacologists, and methodologists. Every Tier 4 safety entry and every supplement scoring 80+ is double-reviewed before publication.
Editorial leadership
How review actually works
Every supplement entry follows the same pipeline: draft → peer-reviewed source check → tier classification → safety review → publication → quarterly re-review.
Tier-1 promotions require independent confirmation from a second reviewer using the methodology spec. Tier-4 (avoid) classifications require sign-off from the safety editor plus a documented evidence trail of recalls, withdrawals, or adverse-event reports.
When new evidence shifts our position on a supplement, the change is published on Changed our mind with the reasoning, the trigger paper, and the date.
Conflict of interest policy
Board members complete an annual COI declaration. Disclosed interests are published on each member’s page and on every supplement entry where the conflict is relevant. Members are recused from any entry where they hold a current financial interest in a manufacturer or distributor of that supplement.
Authors of cited studies are flagged: every citation in the database is tagged with a funder type (public / industry / mixed / none disclosed) and a COI flag (true / false / unknown). See the funder policy for details.
Apply to join
We accept new board members on a rolling basis. Open roles emphasize specialties that round out our coverage — currently endocrinology, sports medicine, and complementary & alternative medicine pharmacology.
Apply to join the board →Volunteer roles. Time commitment is flexible (~4 hours/month).
SupplementScore is a non-profit reference. Editorial board pages will be expanded with named bios, credentials, and ORCID/LinkedIn links as members consent to publication. Until then, roles are listed by function — every score on the site has been reviewed by the named role above.